<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stressing Similarities</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2005/09/27/stressing-similarities/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2005/09/27/stressing-similarities/</link>
	<description>Everyone has a right to my opinions</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 20:10:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Robert Sharp &#187; Blog Archive &#187; In defence of political correctness</title>
		<link>http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2005/09/27/stressing-similarities/#comment-159</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Sharp &#187; Blog Archive &#187; In defence of political correctness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2006 04:20:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/?p=34#comment-159</guid>
		<description>[...] Any policy or ideology can hamper debate if it is applied without thought, or indeed if it is misused by special interest groups. However, this should not discredit the ideology itself. In the past year, the most stark examples of Political Correctness Gone Mad have actually been perpetrated by well-meaning stupid people second guessing what minorities may think, without consulting them. When an artwork was removed from the Tate Britain, for example, it was on the assumption that Muslims would be offended. No Muslims were consulted. This was a prejudice in itself, made worse by the fact that the policy-makers completely misunderstood the actual meaning of John Latham&#8217;s work. Likewise with over-zealous council officials cancelling Christmas Lights in favour of Winter Lights, deafened by the silence of the minority communities&#8217; collective indifference. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Any policy or ideology can hamper debate if it is applied without thought, or indeed if it is misused by special interest groups. However, this should not discredit the ideology itself. In the past year, the most stark examples of Political Correctness Gone Mad have actually been perpetrated by well-meaning stupid people second guessing what minorities may think, without consulting them. When an artwork was removed from the Tate Britain, for example, it was on the assumption that Muslims would be offended. No Muslims were consulted. This was a prejudice in itself, made worse by the fact that the policy-makers completely misunderstood the actual meaning of John Latham&#8217;s work. Likewise with over-zealous council officials cancelling Christmas Lights in favour of Winter Lights, deafened by the silence of the minority communities&#8217; collective indifference. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
