<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Crazy Creationists</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2005/09/29/crazy-creationists/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2005/09/29/crazy-creationists/</link>
	<description>Everyone has a right to my opinions</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 21:18:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2005/09/29/crazy-creationists/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2005 12:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/?p=36#comment-22</guid>
		<description>Yes, failure to make the monky/ape distinction was a school-boy error on my part.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, failure to make the monky/ape distinction was a school-boy error on my part.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: douglas</title>
		<link>http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2005/09/29/crazy-creationists/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>douglas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Oct 2005 00:35:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/?p=36#comment-20</guid>
		<description>Robert,

Interesting post. I see you have attracted the fundmentalists to your 'comment' box. The religious right, which is both rich and media savvy, has attacked evolution in a fight back process against the enlightenment. they do not like the answers that thought produces, and find it demeaning that their diety becomes a 'God of the Gaps' insofar as that which they believed to be true is subverted by scientific evidence.

What they have true difficulty in understanding is that the DNA revolution means that they share a common set of building blocks with other life forms. For example we share almost all our DNA with the great apes. Point of clarification, we are not descended from monkeys, both monkeys and men are descended from a common anscestor.

Creationist folk wish to return God to a prime position in society. And they will use every dirty trick in the book to do it. Ends and means come to mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert,</p>
<p>Interesting post. I see you have attracted the fundmentalists to your &#8216;comment&#8217; box. The religious right, which is both rich and media savvy, has attacked evolution in a fight back process against the enlightenment. they do not like the answers that thought produces, and find it demeaning that their diety becomes a &#8216;God of the Gaps&#8217; insofar as that which they believed to be true is subverted by scientific evidence.</p>
<p>What they have true difficulty in understanding is that the DNA revolution means that they share a common set of building blocks with other life forms. For example we share almost all our DNA with the great apes. Point of clarification, we are not descended from monkeys, both monkeys and men are descended from a common anscestor.</p>
<p>Creationist folk wish to return God to a prime position in society. And they will use every dirty trick in the book to do it. Ends and means come to mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vikram Balaji</title>
		<link>http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2005/09/29/crazy-creationists/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Vikram Balaji</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 17:36:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/?p=36#comment-16</guid>
		<description>I found the article on Crazy Creationists very intresting.  What amazed me the most was your abilty to challenge science and religion.  I want to have a word with you on that.  Albert Einstein said that:

                                Religion without Science is Blind
                                Science without Religion is Lame

What he meant was:   A Belief without an explaination is Blind
                                An Explanation without a Belief is Lame.

The Theory of Relativity States that:  

All things in the world are related but the speed of light is a constant. 

Although he said speed of light is a constant he never wrote the equation as E=MC but he squres the C.  That is why he is a Genius. 

Science defines it as :

E=Energy 
M=Mass
C=Speed of Light 

Religion defines the same as 

E=Energy which is SPIRIT
M=MASS  which is FLESH or the Physical Body
C=Speed of Light which is the GOD which is the Belief


What is the difference between Money and Currency? 

Money is the Belief and Currency is the Power to Relate.  
Money is Water but Currency is Blood. 
Money attracts but Currency Pulls. 
Money is the belief in the Mind and Currency is the Pull one has in the body 

If you get these fundamentals correctly then you would be able to see the connection between Science and Religion.  You will also understand why the First Principles of Management is called EXISTENCE.  What the STATE ABOVE THE INDIVIDUAL AND THE INDIVIDUAL ABOVE THE STATE THEORY means.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found the article on Crazy Creationists very intresting.  What amazed me the most was your abilty to challenge science and religion.  I want to have a word with you on that.  Albert Einstein said that:</p>
<p>                                Religion without Science is Blind<br />
                                Science without Religion is Lame</p>
<p>What he meant was:   A Belief without an explaination is Blind<br />
                                An Explanation without a Belief is Lame.</p>
<p>The Theory of Relativity States that:  </p>
<p>All things in the world are related but the speed of light is a constant. </p>
<p>Although he said speed of light is a constant he never wrote the equation as E=MC but he squres the C.  That is why he is a Genius. </p>
<p>Science defines it as :</p>
<p>E=Energy<br />
M=Mass<br />
C=Speed of Light </p>
<p>Religion defines the same as </p>
<p>E=Energy which is SPIRIT<br />
M=MASS  which is FLESH or the Physical Body<br />
C=Speed of Light which is the GOD which is the Belief</p>
<p>What is the difference between Money and Currency? </p>
<p>Money is the Belief and Currency is the Power to Relate.<br />
Money is Water but Currency is Blood.<br />
Money attracts but Currency Pulls.<br />
Money is the belief in the Mind and Currency is the Pull one has in the body </p>
<p>If you get these fundamentals correctly then you would be able to see the connection between Science and Religion.  You will also understand why the First Principles of Management is called EXISTENCE.  What the STATE ABOVE THE INDIVIDUAL AND THE INDIVIDUAL ABOVE THE STATE THEORY means.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DE</title>
		<link>http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2005/09/29/crazy-creationists/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>DE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2005 19:37:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/?p=36#comment-15</guid>
		<description>Beware your zeal for what is just a very strong theory.  Its actually quite complex science, making it fairly easy to misunderstand. The reality is that large numbers of people who agree with evolution don't fully understand it. In many respects its to be expected that people have difficulty applying Occam's razor and end up siding with intelligent design as an explanation to life on Earth.

There is no intellectual gulf - one is scientific and one isn't. Thus Genesis cannot enter any science labs; its just a case of supporting evolution NOT comparing it with non-science.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beware your zeal for what is just a very strong theory.  Its actually quite complex science, making it fairly easy to misunderstand. The reality is that large numbers of people who agree with evolution don&#8217;t fully understand it. In many respects its to be expected that people have difficulty applying Occam&#8217;s razor and end up siding with intelligent design as an explanation to life on Earth.</p>
<p>There is no intellectual gulf - one is scientific and one isn&#8217;t. Thus Genesis cannot enter any science labs; its just a case of supporting evolution NOT comparing it with non-science.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
