<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reclamation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2005/12/19/reclamation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2005/12/19/reclamation/</link>
	<description>Everyone has a right to my opinions</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 00:02:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Multiculturalism - a definition I like - Voting TaKtiX</title>
		<link>http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2005/12/19/reclamation/#comment-13462</link>
		<dc:creator>Multiculturalism - a definition I like - Voting TaKtiX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Sep 2006 01:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/?p=93#comment-13462</guid>
		<description>[...] December  MatGB03:11 am6 Comments  Was planning to do a post on mis uses of the term &#8216;multiculturalism&#8217; (by both sides), but Robert Sharp has done a pretty good one already: Communities living side-by-side, not integrating, becoming ghettos, that in turn become no-go areas for the police and ordinary citizens. Cultures and ethnicities living side-by-side without integration or communication is not what I would call multiculturalism… just antagonism. Multiculturalism has to imply a certain degree of integration, assimilation, and above all, a process of change for it to be something to value. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] December  MatGB03:11 am6 Comments  Was planning to do a post on mis uses of the term &#8216;multiculturalism&#8217; (by both sides), but Robert Sharp has done a pretty good one already: Communities living side-by-side, not integrating, becoming ghettos, that in turn become no-go areas for the police and ordinary citizens. Cultures and ethnicities living side-by-side without integration or communication is not what I would call multiculturalism… just antagonism. Multiculturalism has to imply a certain degree of integration, assimilation, and above all, a process of change for it to be something to value. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Sharp &#187; Blog Archive &#187; All in the definition</title>
		<link>http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2005/12/19/reclamation/#comment-195</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Sharp &#187; Blog Archive &#187; All in the definition</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2006 15:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/?p=93#comment-195</guid>
		<description>[...] A policeman in Australia misdefines Multiculturalism [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A policeman in Australia misdefines Multiculturalism [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
