<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Muddles of Narnia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2006/01/03/muddles-of-narnia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2006/01/03/muddles-of-narnia/</link>
	<description>Everyone has a right to my opinions</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 17:35:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2006/01/03/muddles-of-narnia/#comment-168</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2006 03:27:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/?p=104#comment-168</guid>
		<description>I think it is the moment in a series when you know it has reached its peak, and will only go downhill from then on.  As in:  

"Gatsby's wonder when he first picked out the green light at the end of Daisy's dock....his dream must have seemed so close that he could hardly fail to grasp it. He did not know that [he had already &lt;a href="http://www.jumptheshark.com/" title="jumping the shark" rel="nofollow"&gt;Jumped the Shark&lt;/a&gt;].  Gatsby believed in the green light, the orgiastic future that year by year recedes before us. It eluded us then, but that's no matter--tomorrow we will run faster, stretch out our arms farther.... And one fine morning--So we beat on, boats against the current, borne back ceaselessly into the past."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it is the moment in a series when you know it has reached its peak, and will only go downhill from then on.  As in:  </p>
<p>&#8220;Gatsby&#8217;s wonder when he first picked out the green light at the end of Daisy&#8217;s dock&#8230;.his dream must have seemed so close that he could hardly fail to grasp it. He did not know that [he had already <a href="http://www.jumptheshark.com/" title="jumping the shark" rel="nofollow">Jumped the Shark</a>].  Gatsby believed in the green light, the orgiastic future that year by year recedes before us. It eluded us then, but that&#8217;s no matter&#8211;tomorrow we will run faster, stretch out our arms farther&#8230;. And one fine morning&#8211;So we beat on, boats against the current, borne back ceaselessly into the past.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Intifada Kid</title>
		<link>http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2006/01/03/muddles-of-narnia/#comment-167</link>
		<dc:creator>Intifada Kid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2006 21:31:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/?p=104#comment-167</guid>
		<description>For those of us following your genuinely fascinating discussions from Palestine: What does 'Jumped the shark' mean?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those of us following your genuinely fascinating discussions from Palestine: What does &#8216;Jumped the shark&#8217; mean?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hanson</title>
		<link>http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2006/01/03/muddles-of-narnia/#comment-157</link>
		<dc:creator>Hanson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2006 07:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/?p=104#comment-157</guid>
		<description>Just a quick note about Rob's view that Santa is just in the book for a bit of crowd-pleasing. None other than J.R.R. Tolkein told Lewis exactly the same thing after reading his first draft.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a quick note about Rob&#8217;s view that Santa is just in the book for a bit of crowd-pleasing. None other than J.R.R. Tolkein told Lewis exactly the same thing after reading his first draft.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clarice</title>
		<link>http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2006/01/03/muddles-of-narnia/#comment-156</link>
		<dc:creator>Clarice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2006 23:55:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/?p=104#comment-156</guid>
		<description>Jumped the Shark! I read about this phrase in planet simpson, didn't realise people actually used it!  What a delight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jumped the Shark! I read about this phrase in planet simpson, didn&#8217;t realise people actually used it!  What a delight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2006/01/03/muddles-of-narnia/#comment-155</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2006 20:37:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/?p=104#comment-155</guid>
		<description>I really didn't get that from the &lt;em&gt;Philosopher's Stone&lt;/em&gt;.  In any case, pre-judging someone as a person with ambition or not is still pretty rubbish, no?  Surely they should be judged on their actions.

But I haven't mustered the energy to read the others yet, which I am told are better, so I shouldn't whine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really didn&#8217;t get that from the <em>Philosopher&#8217;s Stone</em>.  In any case, pre-judging someone as a person with ambition or not is still pretty rubbish, no?  Surely they should be judged on their actions.</p>
<p>But I haven&#8217;t mustered the energy to read the others yet, which I am told are better, so I shouldn&#8217;t whine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matgb</title>
		<link>http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2006/01/03/muddles-of-narnia/#comment-154</link>
		<dc:creator>matgb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2006 20:29:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/?p=104#comment-154</guid>
		<description>Actually, re Potter, as someone who recently dated an obsessive fan (guess what boxed set of books I got for Xmas...), I have it on good authority that the whole point is the shades of grey.

Besides, there isn't an 'evil' house, just a house for those of ambition.  Quite scary how well I can do the argument despite not having read it yet.  Essentially, most of the fans are utterly convinced that Snape is a good guy despite his actions in book six, as otherwise JK's jumped the shark.  Possible, of course, but, well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, re Potter, as someone who recently dated an obsessive fan (guess what boxed set of books I got for Xmas&#8230;), I have it on good authority that the whole point is the shades of grey.</p>
<p>Besides, there isn&#8217;t an &#8216;evil&#8217; house, just a house for those of ambition.  Quite scary how well I can do the argument despite not having read it yet.  Essentially, most of the fans are utterly convinced that Snape is a good guy despite his actions in book six, as otherwise JK&#8217;s jumped the shark.  Possible, of course, but, well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2006/01/03/muddles-of-narnia/#comment-153</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2006 17:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/?p=104#comment-153</guid>
		<description>Don't get me started on Potter.  The black-and-white morality of those stories (a hat judging your entire personality and assigning you a good or evil house accordingly) is pretty insidious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t get me started on Potter.  The black-and-white morality of those stories (a hat judging your entire personality and assigning you a good or evil house accordingly) is pretty insidious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DE</title>
		<link>http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2006/01/03/muddles-of-narnia/#comment-152</link>
		<dc:creator>DE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2006 17:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/?p=104#comment-152</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;No different from any kids literature from that time, eh? &lt;/i&gt;

Indeed not. Thank god for Mary, Mungo and Midge. 

We have got the success of Lord of the Rings to thank for this revival - and maybe even Mr Potter. Dredging up fairly average bits of yesteryear to persuade those in middle Youth and their kids to invest in a factory film is the Hollywood dream of course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>No different from any kids literature from that time, eh? </i></p>
<p>Indeed not. Thank god for Mary, Mungo and Midge. </p>
<p>We have got the success of Lord of the Rings to thank for this revival - and maybe even Mr Potter. Dredging up fairly average bits of yesteryear to persuade those in middle Youth and their kids to invest in a factory film is the Hollywood dream of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matgb</title>
		<link>http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2006/01/03/muddles-of-narnia/#comment-151</link>
		<dc:creator>matgb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2006 15:40:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/?p=104#comment-151</guid>
		<description>Don't tell them, but in the next decent book, "Prince Caspian", they meet Bacchus and get involved in little romp.  So that's Lewis the Christian promoting a pagan god.

I've recently been rereading them (got a box set in a remaindered bookstore), and confirmed what others have said; 4 good books, 3 not good books.  They're making 4 films apparently...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t tell them, but in the next decent book, &#8220;Prince Caspian&#8221;, they meet Bacchus and get involved in little romp.  So that&#8217;s Lewis the Christian promoting a pagan god.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve recently been rereading them (got a box set in a remaindered bookstore), and confirmed what others have said; 4 good books, 3 not good books.  They&#8217;re making 4 films apparently&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2006/01/03/muddles-of-narnia/#comment-150</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2006 14:40:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/?p=104#comment-150</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Middle class white kids wandering around country houses etc.&lt;/em&gt;

No different from any kids literature from that time, eh?  &lt;span class="publication"&gt;Famous Five&lt;/span&gt; was pretty much the same form of escapism, with very young kids doing improbably daring things without adult supervision.

I have yet to read &lt;span class="publication"&gt;His Dark Materials&lt;/span&gt; or indeed &lt;span class="publication"&gt;Paradise Lost&lt;/span&gt; (although the latter is sitting on my bookshelf).  But I am reminded of the furore surrounding &lt;span class="publication"&gt;The Da Vinci Code&lt;/span&gt;.  Christian groups complained of factual inaccuracies in the book... but the central charge - that the Catholic Church is essentially and necessarily sexist to the core - is pretty much correct, and indeed went almost unchallenged!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Middle class white kids wandering around country houses etc.</em></p>
<p>No different from any kids literature from that time, eh?  <span class="publication">Famous Five</span> was pretty much the same form of escapism, with very young kids doing improbably daring things without adult supervision.</p>
<p>I have yet to read <span class="publication">His Dark Materials</span> or indeed <span class="publication">Paradise Lost</span> (although the latter is sitting on my bookshelf).  But I am reminded of the furore surrounding <span class="publication">The Da Vinci Code</span>.  Christian groups complained of factual inaccuracies in the book&#8230; but the central charge - that the Catholic Church is essentially and necessarily sexist to the core - is pretty much correct, and indeed went almost unchallenged!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
