<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Little Guys</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2006/03/14/little-guys/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2006/03/14/little-guys/</link>
	<description>Everyone has a right to my opinions</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 20:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Porn photos bzz</title>
		<link>http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2006/03/14/little-guys/#comment-73156</link>
		<dc:creator>Porn photos bzz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2007 04:35:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/?p=153#comment-73156</guid>
		<description>Your know end news! What is this? Discounts!
&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your know end news! What is this? Discounts!<br />
<a></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pickled Politics &#187; Hype around blogging and comment is free</title>
		<link>http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2006/03/14/little-guys/#comment-377</link>
		<dc:creator>Pickled Politics &#187; Hype around blogging and comment is free</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2006 13:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/?p=153#comment-377</guid>
		<description>[...] My first article on comment is free was published here this morning, on the subject of whether blogging is in danger of being over-hyped. Please, please go there and post your comments! On the subject, I&#8217;ve also referenced recent posts on British blogs on the same subject. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] My first article on comment is free was published here this morning, on the subject of whether blogging is in danger of being over-hyped. Please, please go there and post your comments! On the subject, I&#8217;ve also referenced recent posts on British blogs on the same subject. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Worstall</title>
		<link>http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2006/03/14/little-guys/#comment-374</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Worstall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Mar 2006 15:28:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/?p=153#comment-374</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Britblog Roundup # 57&lt;/strong&gt;

Welcome once again to the Britblog Roundup, that collection of your nominations of the best from these isles this past week. You can send entries for nexrt week’s to britblog AT gmail DOT com. One comment on The Guardian’s little</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Britblog Roundup # 57</strong></p>
<p>Welcome once again to the Britblog Roundup, that collection of your nominations of the best from these isles this past week. You can send entries for nexrt week’s to britblog AT gmail DOT com. One comment on The Guardian’s little</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MatGB</title>
		<link>http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2006/03/14/little-guys/#comment-368</link>
		<dc:creator>MatGB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2006 23:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/?p=153#comment-368</guid>
		<description>Justin; you're in the top 20 for Britblog last I looked, which pretty much shows that overall all our readerships are low; what scares me is how high mine are compared to others that I still think of, well, 'better/more established'?

Morethanthis?  I think it's the lact of comments that lead me to not read Norm as much, he's on my feed, but I tend to just scroll past.  Whereas other blogs I come back to regularly just to see comments (like this one, for example).

Comments, to me, maketh the blog.  And I get my fair share of anonymous trolls same as the rest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Justin; you&#8217;re in the top 20 for Britblog last I looked, which pretty much shows that overall all our readerships are low; what scares me is how high mine are compared to others that I still think of, well, &#8216;better/more established&#8217;?</p>
<p>Morethanthis?  I think it&#8217;s the lact of comments that lead me to not read Norm as much, he&#8217;s on my feed, but I tend to just scroll past.  Whereas other blogs I come back to regularly just to see comments (like this one, for example).</p>
<p>Comments, to me, maketh the blog.  And I get my fair share of anonymous trolls same as the rest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2006/03/14/little-guys/#comment-367</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2006 20:40:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/?p=153#comment-367</guid>
		<description>That may be Justin, but your &lt;a href="http://www.technorati.com/search/chickyog.blogspot.com" title="Technorati" rel="nofollow"&gt;Tecnorati rating&lt;/a&gt; ain't too bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That may be Justin, but your <a href="http://www.technorati.com/search/chickyog.blogspot.com" title="Technorati" rel="nofollow">Tecnorati rating</a> ain&#8217;t too bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2006/03/14/little-guys/#comment-364</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2006 12:06:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/?p=153#comment-364</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Funny how the two bloggers I quote directly in a post entitled “Little Guys” are actually two of the most read in the UK…&lt;/i&gt;

I really must show you my visitor stats some time, Robert. Harry's Place, I ain't. It's more a question of, as Mat says, not how many but who, I think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Funny how the two bloggers I quote directly in a post entitled “Little Guys” are actually two of the most read in the UK…</i></p>
<p>I really must show you my visitor stats some time, Robert. Harry&#8217;s Place, I ain&#8217;t. It&#8217;s more a question of, as Mat says, not how many but who, I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: moorethanthis</title>
		<link>http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2006/03/14/little-guys/#comment-363</link>
		<dc:creator>moorethanthis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2006 07:14:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/?p=153#comment-363</guid>
		<description>Interactivity is not such a huge issue to some bloggers, eg. Norm Geras, Oliver Kamm - those guys don't have comment facilities on their blogs yet still get lods of readers. On the other hand, I believe it's always good to debate your views with others in order to refine and improve them, and to draw readers' attention to things you want to show. Linking and commenting will always be important to the majority of bloggers.

I don't really understand why Guardian Unlimited couldn't just put a disclaimer up on CIF saying "no responsiblity for commenters' opinions/content of external links and such" just like the BBC does. The old Guardian newsblogs, troll-infested as they were, still allowed commenters to include links in their posts. The blog is very new, and I hope they'll change it to allow links.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interactivity is not such a huge issue to some bloggers, eg. Norm Geras, Oliver Kamm - those guys don&#8217;t have comment facilities on their blogs yet still get lods of readers. On the other hand, I believe it&#8217;s always good to debate your views with others in order to refine and improve them, and to draw readers&#8217; attention to things you want to show. Linking and commenting will always be important to the majority of bloggers.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t really understand why Guardian Unlimited couldn&#8217;t just put a disclaimer up on CIF saying &#8220;no responsiblity for commenters&#8217; opinions/content of external links and such&#8221; just like the BBC does. The old Guardian newsblogs, troll-infested as they were, still allowed commenters to include links in their posts. The blog is very new, and I hope they&#8217;ll change it to allow links.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MatGB</title>
		<link>http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2006/03/14/little-guys/#comment-361</link>
		<dc:creator>MatGB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2006 04:30:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/?p=153#comment-361</guid>
		<description>Sunny; I tend to read some blogs every day, others every few days, others weekly.  I also read any roundup style blog that's there, and nominate good stuff to Tim for Britblog weekly.

Ergo; if it's good, it gets linked to.  On a day when I've got writers block, I just throw links to good stuff around; I know it's pointing people in the direction of other well written posts or covering issues that are important.

You're right that not all of them are quality.  When I first started, the blogroll was going to be just the best.  But then, well, I kept finding good blogs, so it became 'all the politics blogs'.  But then I found some dire ones, and decided to filter at least some.

But then, everyone has at least one good post in them, right?

Robert; the issue with success meaning you can't engage any more is why I think group blogs are, medium term, the way to go.  Most of the time, someone asks Paul a question, I can answer it, and vice versa.  Of course, getting a co-blogger whose views are almost identical to mine was fortuitous to say the least.

On the other hand, if we get so succesful we become broadcast, then the ad revenue becomes enough to do it full time, right?  Giving us more time to respond...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sunny; I tend to read some blogs every day, others every few days, others weekly.  I also read any roundup style blog that&#8217;s there, and nominate good stuff to Tim for Britblog weekly.</p>
<p>Ergo; if it&#8217;s good, it gets linked to.  On a day when I&#8217;ve got writers block, I just throw links to good stuff around; I know it&#8217;s pointing people in the direction of other well written posts or covering issues that are important.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re right that not all of them are quality.  When I first started, the blogroll was going to be just the best.  But then, well, I kept finding good blogs, so it became &#8216;all the politics blogs&#8217;.  But then I found some dire ones, and decided to filter at least some.</p>
<p>But then, everyone has at least one good post in them, right?</p>
<p>Robert; the issue with success meaning you can&#8217;t engage any more is why I think group blogs are, medium term, the way to go.  Most of the time, someone asks Paul a question, I can answer it, and vice versa.  Of course, getting a co-blogger whose views are almost identical to mine was fortuitous to say the least.</p>
<p>On the other hand, if we get so succesful we become broadcast, then the ad revenue becomes enough to do it full time, right?  Giving us more time to respond&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DE</title>
		<link>http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2006/03/14/little-guys/#comment-359</link>
		<dc:creator>DE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2006 23:56:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/?p=153#comment-359</guid>
		<description>When I started blogging it only hit me much later that the main stream media just-don't-get-it. No doubt they will, but for the moment the truly public sphere is somewhere they cannot get to. Whether its for commercial, political or legal considerations, a newspaper has to place an impermeable  barrier between itself and the real world. 

If your memory goes back long enough you may remember the Modern Review, the first organ that was entirely "Low Culture for Highbrows"; stuff we find weekly in every glossy magazine today. Those glossy  magazines took many years to catch on to the idea - that you could write serious articles on someone or something that was popular as opposed to lauded.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I started blogging it only hit me much later that the main stream media just-don&#8217;t-get-it. No doubt they will, but for the moment the truly public sphere is somewhere they cannot get to. Whether its for commercial, political or legal considerations, a newspaper has to place an impermeable  barrier between itself and the real world. </p>
<p>If your memory goes back long enough you may remember the Modern Review, the first organ that was entirely &#8220;Low Culture for Highbrows&#8221;; stuff we find weekly in every glossy magazine today. Those glossy  magazines took many years to catch on to the idea - that you could write serious articles on someone or something that was popular as opposed to lauded.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2006/03/14/little-guys/#comment-351</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2006 10:28:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/?p=153#comment-351</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;how do you actually find it?&lt;/em&gt;

This is where the importance of comments, interactivity and linkage comes in... and where BBC blogs and 'Comment is Free' fall down.

Clay Shirky's &lt;a href="http://shirky.com/writings/powerlaw_weblog.html" title="Essay" rel="nofollow"&gt;essay on Power Laws and Weblog Inequality&lt;/a&gt; is interesting reading about the rise of A-list bloggers:

"At the head will be webloggers who join the mainstream media (a phrase which seems to mean "media we've gotten used to.") The transformation here is simple - as a blogger's audience grows large, more people read her work than she can possibly read, she can't link to everyone who wants her attention, and she can't answer all her incoming mail or follow up to the comments on her site. The result of these pressures is that she becomes a broadcast outlet, distributing material without participating in conversations about it."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>how do you actually find it?</em></p>
<p>This is where the importance of comments, interactivity and linkage comes in&#8230; and where BBC blogs and &#8216;Comment is Free&#8217; fall down.</p>
<p>Clay Shirky&#8217;s <a href="http://shirky.com/writings/powerlaw_weblog.html" title="Essay" rel="nofollow">essay on Power Laws and Weblog Inequality</a> is interesting reading about the rise of A-list bloggers:</p>
<p>&#8220;At the head will be webloggers who join the mainstream media (a phrase which seems to mean &#8220;media we&#8217;ve gotten used to.&#8221;) The transformation here is simple - as a blogger&#8217;s audience grows large, more people read her work than she can possibly read, she can&#8217;t link to everyone who wants her attention, and she can&#8217;t answer all her incoming mail or follow up to the comments on her site. The result of these pressures is that she becomes a broadcast outlet, distributing material without participating in conversations about it.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
