<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Analogue vs Digital</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2006/03/22/analogue-vs-digital/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2006/03/22/analogue-vs-digital/</link>
	<description>Everyone has a right to my opinions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 00:40:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Clarice</title>
		<link>http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2006/03/22/analogue-vs-digital/comment-page-1/#comment-417</link>
		<dc:creator>Clarice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Mar 2006 18:37:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2006/03/22/analogue-vs-digital/#comment-417</guid>
		<description>Did anyone hear Ned Sherrin on Loose Ends?  A cathode ray tube polititician in a plasma screen age.  Or an ipod bishop in a gramophone church.... The possibilities are endless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did anyone hear Ned Sherrin on Loose Ends?  A cathode ray tube polititician in a plasma screen age.  Or an ipod bishop in a gramophone church&#8230;. The possibilities are endless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clive Davis</title>
		<link>http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2006/03/22/analogue-vs-digital/comment-page-1/#comment-399</link>
		<dc:creator>Clive Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 13:15:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2006/03/22/analogue-vs-digital/#comment-399</guid>
		<description>Good point... DC hoist by his own I-Pod!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point&#8230; DC hoist by his own I-Pod!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clarice</title>
		<link>http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2006/03/22/analogue-vs-digital/comment-page-1/#comment-395</link>
		<dc:creator>Clarice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 00:22:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2006/03/22/analogue-vs-digital/#comment-395</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure I agree with the quality argument, but what do I know?

I also like this post, because it contains a meta-metaphor.  

Metaphors work by analogical mapping, as does analogue technology.  So what is David Cameron doing using metaphor, if he feels so disparaging towards all things analogical?  In a purely digital age, there can be no such thing as metaphor - there is no digital equivalent.  The digital/analogue dichotomy he raises is itself a product of &quot;digital&quot;-style binary thinking.  By his very use of the metaphor, he undermines his own argument.  Lovely!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure I agree with the quality argument, but what do I know?</p>
<p>I also like this post, because it contains a meta-metaphor.  </p>
<p>Metaphors work by analogical mapping, as does analogue technology.  So what is David Cameron doing using metaphor, if he feels so disparaging towards all things analogical?  In a purely digital age, there can be no such thing as metaphor &#8211; there is no digital equivalent.  The digital/analogue dichotomy he raises is itself a product of &#8220;digital&#8221;-style binary thinking.  By his very use of the metaphor, he undermines his own argument.  Lovely!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
