<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Voter responsibility</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2006/04/24/voter-responsibility/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2006/04/24/voter-responsibility/</link>
	<description>Everyone has a right to my opinions</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 22:31:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Cleanthes</title>
		<link>http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2006/04/24/voter-responsibility/#comment-40211</link>
		<dc:creator>Cleanthes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 17:08:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/?p=173#comment-40211</guid>
		<description>"Instead we write them off as people not interested in peace,"

No we don't. At least I don't. I write off the *Government* of the PA as not being interested in peace.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Instead we write them off as people not interested in peace,&#8221;</p>
<p>No we don&#8217;t. At least I don&#8217;t. I write off the *Government* of the PA as not being interested in peace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clarice</title>
		<link>http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2006/04/24/voter-responsibility/#comment-1963</link>
		<dc:creator>Clarice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Apr 2006 00:56:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/?p=173#comment-1963</guid>
		<description>Yes.  I can see why voting should be anonymous, but I think that removes responsibility from the individual.  There should be consequences in the form of personal punishments for voting stupidly, or in a reactive or ill-informed manner.  People shouldn't be able to say "*I* didn't vote for them" without being able to prove it.  And if they can't prove it, then they should be able to justify why they voted as they did, or face punishment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes.  I can see why voting should be anonymous, but I think that removes responsibility from the individual.  There should be consequences in the form of personal punishments for voting stupidly, or in a reactive or ill-informed manner.  People shouldn&#8217;t be able to say &#8220;*I* didn&#8217;t vote for them&#8221; without being able to prove it.  And if they can&#8217;t prove it, then they should be able to justify why they voted as they did, or face punishment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2006/04/24/voter-responsibility/#comment-1890</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2006 14:54:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/?p=173#comment-1890</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Also, I don’t think hating Americans really counts as racist - which race exactly is being hated in such a situation?&lt;/em&gt;

Prejudice then.  Assuming that all people are going to be similar, when they're not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Also, I don’t think hating Americans really counts as racist - which race exactly is being hated in such a situation?</em></p>
<p>Prejudice then.  Assuming that all people are going to be similar, when they&#8217;re not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clarice</title>
		<link>http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2006/04/24/voter-responsibility/#comment-1877</link>
		<dc:creator>Clarice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2006 13:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/?p=173#comment-1877</guid>
		<description>Very good Rob.  

But the whole point of democracy is that it IS a "tyranny" of the majority.  I'm not sure that "tyranny" is quite the right word though, since that implies an arbitrary use of authority, whereas a democratically-organised set-up is by definition not arbitrary.  I think, as Kathy says, the question is whether the majority of the electorate are well-educated, well-informed and well-motivated to vote for an ethical government - and the answer to that in any given instance is a product of previous government policies.

Also, I don't think hating Americans really counts as racist - which race exactly is being hated in such a situation?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very good Rob.  </p>
<p>But the whole point of democracy is that it IS a &#8220;tyranny&#8221; of the majority.  I&#8217;m not sure that &#8220;tyranny&#8221; is quite the right word though, since that implies an arbitrary use of authority, whereas a democratically-organised set-up is by definition not arbitrary.  I think, as Kathy says, the question is whether the majority of the electorate are well-educated, well-informed and well-motivated to vote for an ethical government - and the answer to that in any given instance is a product of previous government policies.</p>
<p>Also, I don&#8217;t think hating Americans really counts as racist - which race exactly is being hated in such a situation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathy</title>
		<link>http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2006/04/24/voter-responsibility/#comment-1718</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 13:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/?p=173#comment-1718</guid>
		<description>In the words of Tony "Education, Education, Education" (but by whom???)
Catch 22</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the words of Tony &#8220;Education, Education, Education&#8221; (but by whom???)<br />
Catch 22</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Newman</title>
		<link>http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2006/04/24/voter-responsibility/#comment-1651</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Newman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2006 13:38:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/?p=173#comment-1651</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;I feel you are a bit harsh to say that I deserve whatever may happen if a BNP government is elected even if I vote for another party.&lt;/em&gt;

You personally will not deserve whatever may happen.  But "we", as in the electorate, collectively will.

&lt;em&gt;We are into the realms of collective responsibily. &lt;/em&gt;

Exactly.  And if an electorate are not collectively responsible for whom they vote into office, then with whom does the responsibility of electing a suitable government lie?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>I feel you are a bit harsh to say that I deserve whatever may happen if a BNP government is elected even if I vote for another party.</em></p>
<p>You personally will not deserve whatever may happen.  But &#8220;we&#8221;, as in the electorate, collectively will.</p>
<p><em>We are into the realms of collective responsibily. </em></p>
<p>Exactly.  And if an electorate are not collectively responsible for whom they vote into office, then with whom does the responsibility of electing a suitable government lie?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathy</title>
		<link>http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2006/04/24/voter-responsibility/#comment-1640</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2006 11:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/?p=173#comment-1640</guid>
		<description>Tim, I do not know to whom Robert is referring  either, but I feel you are a bit harsh to say that I deserve whatever may happen if a BNP government is elected even if I vote for another party. I may have done all in my power to make sure that the BNP do not get enough votes, so I may have to suffer the consequences but do I deserve them??
We are into the realms of collective responsibily.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim, I do not know to whom Robert is referring  either, but I feel you are a bit harsh to say that I deserve whatever may happen if a BNP government is elected even if I vote for another party. I may have done all in my power to make sure that the BNP do not get enough votes, so I may have to suffer the consequences but do I deserve them??<br />
We are into the realms of collective responsibily.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Newman</title>
		<link>http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2006/04/24/voter-responsibility/#comment-1610</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Newman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2006 05:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/?p=173#comment-1610</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Likewise, pointing at a random Palestinian and saying “sorry mate, you brought it on yourself” seems spectacularly unfair, as is calling anyone from Barking a racist.&lt;/em&gt;

I'm not sure who you are referring to with this sentence, but I hope it isn't me.  My position is that the Palestinians (meaning the electorate) elected Hamas into government, and like it or not, they are stuck with them until the end of their term of office.  I understand that not all Palestinians voted for Hamas, but &lt;em&gt;collectively&lt;/em&gt; they voted in such a manner that Hamas has been elected.

My point is that no Palestinian, having collectively voted in such a way that Hamas is now their government, has the right to demand international aid to assist Hamas in implementing its policies.  The fact that not all Palestinians voted for Hamas matters not one jot in this instance.  

If Palestinians collectively want international aid, they are going to have to learn to collectively vote in such a way that Hamas does not get into power - in much the same way that the UK votes collectively to ensure the BNP does not get into power, i.e. by isolating the BNP politically and voting for more moderate parties.  If the British public show apathy or recklessness to the point that we collectively manage to elect a BNP government, then we will deserve everything we get.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Likewise, pointing at a random Palestinian and saying “sorry mate, you brought it on yourself” seems spectacularly unfair, as is calling anyone from Barking a racist.</em></p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure who you are referring to with this sentence, but I hope it isn&#8217;t me.  My position is that the Palestinians (meaning the electorate) elected Hamas into government, and like it or not, they are stuck with them until the end of their term of office.  I understand that not all Palestinians voted for Hamas, but <em>collectively</em> they voted in such a manner that Hamas has been elected.</p>
<p>My point is that no Palestinian, having collectively voted in such a way that Hamas is now their government, has the right to demand international aid to assist Hamas in implementing its policies.  The fact that not all Palestinians voted for Hamas matters not one jot in this instance.  </p>
<p>If Palestinians collectively want international aid, they are going to have to learn to collectively vote in such a way that Hamas does not get into power - in much the same way that the UK votes collectively to ensure the BNP does not get into power, i.e. by isolating the BNP politically and voting for more moderate parties.  If the British public show apathy or recklessness to the point that we collectively manage to elect a BNP government, then we will deserve everything we get.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
