<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Waves</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2006/11/23/waves/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2006/11/23/waves/</link>
	<description>Everyone has a right to my opinions</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 02:56:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Robert Sharp &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Theatre reviewing and blogs</title>
		<link>http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2006/11/23/waves/#comment-99011</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Sharp &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Theatre reviewing and blogs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2007 17:08:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2006/11/23/waves/#comment-99011</guid>
		<description>[...] Meanwhile, Lyn Gardner is a good deal more positive about the medium of blogging. It was her contribution which drew me to the debate, because last year I remember she used The Guardian&#8217;s theatre blog to publish a dissenting review of Katie Mitchell&#8217;s Waves, which had been panned by&#8230; none other than Michael Billington. Sadly, an online argument about Mitchell&#8217;s (admittedly divisve) work never materialised. This was a shame, since this sort of debate, between critics who care, is a feature which Billington himself misses. Blogs can complement theatre criticism, not challenge and marginalise it in the way that TV and film reviews have done. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Meanwhile, Lyn Gardner is a good deal more positive about the medium of blogging. It was her contribution which drew me to the debate, because last year I remember she used The Guardian&#8217;s theatre blog to publish a dissenting review of Katie Mitchell&#8217;s Waves, which had been panned by&#8230; none other than Michael Billington. Sadly, an online argument about Mitchell&#8217;s (admittedly divisve) work never materialised. This was a shame, since this sort of debate, between critics who care, is a feature which Billington himself misses. Blogs can complement theatre criticism, not challenge and marginalise it in the way that TV and film reviews have done. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2006/11/23/waves/#comment-54625</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 13:53:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2006/11/23/waves/#comment-54625</guid>
		<description>Erm, the links in my original post seem to work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Erm, the links in my original post seem to work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2006/11/23/waves/#comment-47826</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 18:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2006/11/23/waves/#comment-47826</guid>
		<description>where are all these reveiews i cant find any on the times guardian sites etc. Rob</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>where are all these reveiews i cant find any on the times guardian sites etc. Rob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2006/11/23/waves/#comment-24955</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 13:35:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2006/11/23/waves/#comment-24955</guid>
		<description>Indeed:  http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2101-2466006.html

"I never thought it would work. But it does. Katie Mitchell and her eight actors have devised an installation functioning as theatre ... This is an extraordinary show: spellbinding, sophisticated and moving."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed:  <a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2101-2466006.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2101-2466006.html</a></p>
<p>&#8220;I never thought it would work. But it does. Katie Mitchell and her eight actors have devised an installation functioning as theatre &#8230; This is an extraordinary show: spellbinding, sophisticated and moving.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Granny Rose</title>
		<link>http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2006/11/23/waves/#comment-24949</link>
		<dc:creator>Granny Rose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 12:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2006/11/23/waves/#comment-24949</guid>
		<description>There was a good review in this weeks Sunday Times.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was a good review in this weeks Sunday Times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fay</title>
		<link>http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2006/11/23/waves/#comment-24316</link>
		<dc:creator>Fay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2006 18:06:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2006/11/23/waves/#comment-24316</guid>
		<description>I might have time to spare in London on Thursday evening, so it would be great to see it – and then, I hope, to be in a position to argue with Mr Billington.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I might have time to spare in London on Thursday evening, so it would be great to see it – and then, I hope, to be in a position to argue with Mr Billington.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Granny Rose</title>
		<link>http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2006/11/23/waves/#comment-24286</link>
		<dc:creator>Granny Rose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2006 16:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2006/11/23/waves/#comment-24286</guid>
		<description>Haven'tsee it yet but will do and will then post my comment</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haven&#8217;tsee it yet but will do and will then post my comment</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
