<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Voting for minorities</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2007/02/05/voting-for-minorities/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2007/02/05/voting-for-minorities/</link>
	<description>Everyone has a right to my opinions</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 18:15:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Robert Sharp &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Voting for Someone Different</title>
		<link>http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2007/02/05/voting-for-minorities/#comment-128272</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Sharp &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Voting for Someone Different</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 00:49:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2007/02/05/voting-for-minorities/#comment-128272</guid>
		<description>[...] Meanwhile, a race row circles the Democratic Party like a vulture. &#8220;Is America ready for a black president?&#8221; squwark the commentators, comfortable with their cliches.  Just under a year ago, I wondered whether a good indicator of a mature democracy is when someone who is not from the traditional ruling elite is elected.  I admit this is a rather optimistic stance when Hillary and Barack are mudslinging, but I think there&#8217;s a kernel of truth here.  Voting for someone who is different, be it gender, colour or ethnicity, requires a certain confidence in the system.  It is an acknowledgement that you have certain things in common with someone from a different background (this is what the Dalai Lama calls multiculturalism).  And of course, it means there is a high level of political equality. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Meanwhile, a race row circles the Democratic Party like a vulture. &#8220;Is America ready for a black president?&#8221; squwark the commentators, comfortable with their cliches.  Just under a year ago, I wondered whether a good indicator of a mature democracy is when someone who is not from the traditional ruling elite is elected.  I admit this is a rather optimistic stance when Hillary and Barack are mudslinging, but I think there&#8217;s a kernel of truth here.  Voting for someone who is different, be it gender, colour or ethnicity, requires a certain confidence in the system.  It is an acknowledgement that you have certain things in common with someone from a different background (this is what the Dalai Lama calls multiculturalism).  And of course, it means there is a high level of political equality. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Munro</title>
		<link>http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2007/02/05/voting-for-minorities/#comment-41214</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Munro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 13:29:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2007/02/05/voting-for-minorities/#comment-41214</guid>
		<description>To answer your points in order

1)  I am not a woman so why should I be concerned with the "very real issues" they face every day ?  Are you concerned about the very real issues that men face every day ? 
 
2) I am a junior civil servant so hardly "buried in male privelidge" (even if there is such a thing).  Contrary to popular feminist opinion the lived experience of most men (outside the elite) does not lead them to conclude they are privelidged or powerfull.   Yes I have read the research (I have a BSc in Psychology) it was conducted by a woman, and no I can't cite a reference at the moment. 

3)  A number of years ago, as an experiment, an executive job was advertised in a national newspaper with a salary of circa 60k.  Only males applied.  Two weeks later exactly the same job was advertised in the same paper with a salary of circa 35k.  Male and female applicants applied.  This fairly conclusively shows that women apply for lower paid jobs IMHO. 
 
4)  Irrespective of natures balancing act, given that 25% of working age women are out of the workforce at any one time, in many workplaces men must be the majority.  Even where they are not, women will claim minority (in the political sense) status.  You can't have it both ways.
 
5)  Being critical of women does not mean you hate them any more than being critical of men makes you a man hater.  It's just that under the PC jackboot you're not allowed to question the prevailing orthodoxy that men are overprivelidged bastards ruthleslessly exploiting women at every opportunity, nor are you allowed to claim that women are anything other than infallible, cute, fluffy bunnies.  And yes I have a girlfriend and a mother.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To answer your points in order</p>
<p>1)  I am not a woman so why should I be concerned with the &#8220;very real issues&#8221; they face every day ?  Are you concerned about the very real issues that men face every day ? </p>
<p>2) I am a junior civil servant so hardly &#8220;buried in male privelidge&#8221; (even if there is such a thing).  Contrary to popular feminist opinion the lived experience of most men (outside the elite) does not lead them to conclude they are privelidged or powerfull.   Yes I have read the research (I have a BSc in Psychology) it was conducted by a woman, and no I can&#8217;t cite a reference at the moment. </p>
<p>3)  A number of years ago, as an experiment, an executive job was advertised in a national newspaper with a salary of circa 60k.  Only males applied.  Two weeks later exactly the same job was advertised in the same paper with a salary of circa 35k.  Male and female applicants applied.  This fairly conclusively shows that women apply for lower paid jobs IMHO. </p>
<p>4)  Irrespective of natures balancing act, given that 25% of working age women are out of the workforce at any one time, in many workplaces men must be the majority.  Even where they are not, women will claim minority (in the political sense) status.  You can&#8217;t have it both ways.</p>
<p>5)  Being critical of women does not mean you hate them any more than being critical of men makes you a man hater.  It&#8217;s just that under the PC jackboot you&#8217;re not allowed to question the prevailing orthodoxy that men are overprivelidged bastards ruthleslessly exploiting women at every opportunity, nor are you allowed to claim that women are anything other than infallible, cute, fluffy bunnies.  And yes I have a girlfriend and a mother.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clarice</title>
		<link>http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2007/02/05/voting-for-minorities/#comment-40857</link>
		<dc:creator>Clarice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Feb 2007 01:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2007/02/05/voting-for-minorities/#comment-40857</guid>
		<description>Oh, and PS:
well said, MK.  I wouldn't say I'm shocked, just saddened really.  

I also think it's sweet that he thinks males constitute a majority.  Presumably he knows the odds of being either male or female are approximately 50/50.  Skewed mindset, you see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and PS:<br />
well said, MK.  I wouldn&#8217;t say I&#8217;m shocked, just saddened really.  </p>
<p>I also think it&#8217;s sweet that he thinks males constitute a majority.  Presumably he knows the odds of being either male or female are approximately 50/50.  Skewed mindset, you see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clarice</title>
		<link>http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2007/02/05/voting-for-minorities/#comment-40854</link>
		<dc:creator>Clarice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Feb 2007 01:37:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2007/02/05/voting-for-minorities/#comment-40854</guid>
		<description>Wow, Judith Adams.  Beautiful comment.  I wish you had a blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, Judith Adams.  Beautiful comment.  I wish you had a blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MK</title>
		<link>http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2007/02/05/voting-for-minorities/#comment-40699</link>
		<dc:creator>MK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2007 00:04:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2007/02/05/voting-for-minorities/#comment-40699</guid>
		<description>Wow, Matt, I can't speak for anyone else that reads this blog but personally I am shocked by your lack of acknowledgement of the very real issues that face women every day. You are such a misogynist (learn to spell it correctly, please) it is truly jaw-dropping.  Anti-male "cultrure" is not destroying this country, quite the contrary. You are so buried in your own male privilege, you have no idea what goes on.
I don't feel like giving Feminism 101 to such an unwilling student, but please do yourself a favour and do some research (start with the basics, google it), or at the very least back up your "facts".
For example, I cited my source for the stats on male violence. Can you prove that women apply for lower paid jobs than men? You make a lot of sweeping statements with zero backup. 
(oh and P.S., I don't hate men - quite the opposite. I dearly love my father, my brothers, my partner, and my male friends. They are reasonable men, not judgmental jerks.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, Matt, I can&#8217;t speak for anyone else that reads this blog but personally I am shocked by your lack of acknowledgement of the very real issues that face women every day. You are such a misogynist (learn to spell it correctly, please) it is truly jaw-dropping.  Anti-male &#8220;cultrure&#8221; is not destroying this country, quite the contrary. You are so buried in your own male privilege, you have no idea what goes on.<br />
I don&#8217;t feel like giving Feminism 101 to such an unwilling student, but please do yourself a favour and do some research (start with the basics, google it), or at the very least back up your &#8220;facts&#8221;.<br />
For example, I cited my source for the stats on male violence. Can you prove that women apply for lower paid jobs than men? You make a lot of sweeping statements with zero backup.<br />
(oh and P.S., I don&#8217;t hate men - quite the opposite. I dearly love my father, my brothers, my partner, and my male friends. They are reasonable men, not judgmental jerks.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Munro</title>
		<link>http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2007/02/05/voting-for-minorities/#comment-40624</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Munro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 11:50:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2007/02/05/voting-for-minorities/#comment-40624</guid>
		<description>Same quailifications, same ability, same experience, same pay demands = same pay.  Research shows that all other things being equal women apply for lower paid jobs than men- not the same as being paid less than men
Mysogny in workplace - Workplace shemes give women an advantage - less is expected of you than the majority 
Word that means hatred of men only - "Misandrist"
Male violence is used to secure and protect resources for women and their children 

Getting so tired of the anti male cultrure that is slowly destroying this country........................</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Same quailifications, same ability, same experience, same pay demands = same pay.  Research shows that all other things being equal women apply for lower paid jobs than men- not the same as being paid less than men<br />
Mysogny in workplace - Workplace shemes give women an advantage - less is expected of you than the majority<br />
Word that means hatred of men only - &#8220;Misandrist&#8221;<br />
Male violence is used to secure and protect resources for women and their children </p>
<p>Getting so tired of the anti male cultrure that is slowly destroying this country&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judith Adams</title>
		<link>http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2007/02/05/voting-for-minorities/#comment-40522</link>
		<dc:creator>Judith Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 14:03:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2007/02/05/voting-for-minorities/#comment-40522</guid>
		<description>It's been so long, oh lord, since we had the vote - and look who rules us still - and how harsh the male environment is at Westminster for any woman not made of steel who, like Thatcher, basically scorns her own sex.

And while we fiddle with minority representation and lower pay scales and mysogyny in the worksplace, and the lack of a word that means hatred of men only in common currency - here come the primitive religions again, to murder us for not protecting men from their own violence by effacing ourselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s been so long, oh lord, since we had the vote - and look who rules us still - and how harsh the male environment is at Westminster for any woman not made of steel who, like Thatcher, basically scorns her own sex.</p>
<p>And while we fiddle with minority representation and lower pay scales and mysogyny in the worksplace, and the lack of a word that means hatred of men only in common currency - here come the primitive religions again, to murder us for not protecting men from their own violence by effacing ourselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sunny</title>
		<link>http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2007/02/05/voting-for-minorities/#comment-40255</link>
		<dc:creator>Sunny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 23:46:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2007/02/05/voting-for-minorities/#comment-40255</guid>
		<description>The same applies to Indira and Sonia Gandhi too. They did well out of the family name...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The same applies to Indira and Sonia Gandhi too. They did well out of the family name&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
