<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Clegg and the Digital Revolution</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2007/12/10/clegg-digital-revolution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2007/12/10/clegg-digital-revolution/</link>
	<description>Everyone has a right to my opinions</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 20:48:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lance Howard</title>
		<link>http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2007/12/10/clegg-digital-revolution/#comment-118416</link>
		<dc:creator>Lance Howard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 01:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2007/12/10/clegg-digital-revolution/#comment-118416</guid>
		<description>Talking about access and digital technology in Africa,  I can tell you from first hand experience this year in Uganda, there was coverage for mobile phones even in remote areas of the Murchison Falls National Park and up Mount Elgon in the east of the country.  I regularly lose coverage here at home on the road between Fleet and Aldershot!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Talking about access and digital technology in Africa,  I can tell you from first hand experience this year in Uganda, there was coverage for mobile phones even in remote areas of the Murchison Falls National Park and up Mount Elgon in the east of the country.  I regularly lose coverage here at home on the road between Fleet and Aldershot!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2007/12/10/clegg-digital-revolution/#comment-118373</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 16:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2007/12/10/clegg-digital-revolution/#comment-118373</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;From a sociological perspective the interesting question is whether the net qualitatively changes the social world any more than the printing press, the telegraph, the mail, or the telephone did when they were invented. I’m not convinced that it does.&lt;/em&gt;

I disagree, in that I think it does... or rather, &lt;em&gt;will&lt;/em&gt;.  Although at the moment, the net refers mainly to PC use.  I don't think profound changes will take place until other methods of access become widespread too.  Have a look at &lt;a href="http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2005/11/12/alternative-currencies/" rel="nofollow"&gt;this post&lt;/a&gt; about digital technology aiding development in rural Kenya.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>From a sociological perspective the interesting question is whether the net qualitatively changes the social world any more than the printing press, the telegraph, the mail, or the telephone did when they were invented. I’m not convinced that it does.</em></p>
<p>I disagree, in that I think it does&#8230; or rather, <em>will</em>.  Although at the moment, the net refers mainly to PC use.  I don&#8217;t think profound changes will take place until other methods of access become widespread too.  Have a look at <a href="http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2005/11/12/alternative-currencies/" rel="nofollow">this post</a> about digital technology aiding development in rural Kenya.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Munro</title>
		<link>http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2007/12/10/clegg-digital-revolution/#comment-118370</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Munro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 16:16:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2007/12/10/clegg-digital-revolution/#comment-118370</guid>
		<description>I'm not convinced that the net really will negate established structures.   Business and government are busily imposing their structures on it, and you could argue that ownership of the net, in the physical sense, is a perfect model of gloablised monpolistic capitalism (restrictions on software and hardware, creeping censorship, elite dominance etc etc) and there is a tendency to assume that it is a tool of the majority when IIRC only around 30% of the worlds populance have net acess.
From a sociological perspective the interesting question is whether the net qualitatively changes the social world any more than the printing press, the telegraph, the mail, or the telephone did when they were invented.  I'm not convinced that it does.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not convinced that the net really will negate established structures.   Business and government are busily imposing their structures on it, and you could argue that ownership of the net, in the physical sense, is a perfect model of gloablised monpolistic capitalism (restrictions on software and hardware, creeping censorship, elite dominance etc etc) and there is a tendency to assume that it is a tool of the majority when IIRC only around 30% of the worlds populance have net acess.<br />
From a sociological perspective the interesting question is whether the net qualitatively changes the social world any more than the printing press, the telegraph, the mail, or the telephone did when they were invented.  I&#8217;m not convinced that it does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leon</title>
		<link>http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2007/12/10/clegg-digital-revolution/#comment-118282</link>
		<dc:creator>Leon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 16:49:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2007/12/10/clegg-digital-revolution/#comment-118282</guid>
		<description>I think it's more than about delivering 'services' to one and other too...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s more than about delivering &#8217;services&#8217; to one and other too&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jameshigham</title>
		<link>http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2007/12/10/clegg-digital-revolution/#comment-118064</link>
		<dc:creator>jameshigham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 12:05:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2007/12/10/clegg-digital-revolution/#comment-118064</guid>
		<description>Google, Wikipedia, Facebook, YouTube – are about something very different: they are about the surveillance society, the new-feudalism and post democracy post-2010.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google, Wikipedia, Facebook, YouTube – are about something very different: they are about the surveillance society, the new-feudalism and post democracy post-2010.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
