<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Iconoclasm</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2007/12/15/iconoclasm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2007/12/15/iconoclasm/</link>
	<description>Everyone has a right to my opinions</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 08:53:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Cleanthes</title>
		<link>http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2007/12/15/iconoclasm/#comment-119900</link>
		<dc:creator>Cleanthes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 14:24:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2007/12/15/iconoclasm/#comment-119900</guid>
		<description>Oh don't worry about me Robert: As I v fond of saying: offense has to be intended - it cannot be "taken" and I don't for a moment think you're being offensive, just, well, to be honest I'm not sure what you're being. I think that's my point.

&lt;i&gt;"I’m dealing with Andrew’s “general rule”"&lt;/i&gt;
Even at that level, I think you're being wilfully stupid Robert.

I very very much doubt that Andrew is suggesting that PRECISELY the same allegory that is used against Catholicism or whatever be deployed against Islam. It's the level of provocativeness or challenging-ness (if I'm allowed to all Rowan Atkinson for a mo) that matters, not the content or iconography.
&lt;a href="http://www.samizdata.net/blog/archives/2007/11/a_different_per.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;This&lt;/a&gt; is perhaps what he is talking about.

The &lt;i&gt;really&lt;/i&gt; notable thing is that even to acknowledge your self-censorship apparently takes enormous courage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh don&#8217;t worry about me Robert: As I v fond of saying: offense has to be intended - it cannot be &#8220;taken&#8221; and I don&#8217;t for a moment think you&#8217;re being offensive, just, well, to be honest I&#8217;m not sure what you&#8217;re being. I think that&#8217;s my point.</p>
<p><i>&#8220;I’m dealing with Andrew’s “general rule”&#8221;</i><br />
Even at that level, I think you&#8217;re being wilfully stupid Robert.</p>
<p>I very very much doubt that Andrew is suggesting that PRECISELY the same allegory that is used against Catholicism or whatever be deployed against Islam. It&#8217;s the level of provocativeness or challenging-ness (if I&#8217;m allowed to all Rowan Atkinson for a mo) that matters, not the content or iconography.<br />
<a href="http://www.samizdata.net/blog/archives/2007/11/a_different_per.html" rel="nofollow">This</a> is perhaps what he is talking about.</p>
<p>The <i>really</i> notable thing is that even to acknowledge your self-censorship apparently takes enormous courage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2007/12/15/iconoclasm/#comment-119181</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 15:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2007/12/15/iconoclasm/#comment-119181</guid>
		<description>Sorry to have caused offence.  To be clear, I'm dealing with Andrew's "general rule", not making a defence of those who cannot handle a cartoon or an oddly named teddy bear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry to have caused offence.  To be clear, I&#8217;m dealing with Andrew&#8217;s &#8220;general rule&#8221;, not making a defence of those who cannot handle a cartoon or an oddly named teddy bear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cleanthes</title>
		<link>http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2007/12/15/iconoclasm/#comment-119172</link>
		<dc:creator>Cleanthes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 14:21:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2007/12/15/iconoclasm/#comment-119172</guid>
		<description>Robert,

It's unlike you to be quite this wilfully stupid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert,</p>
<p>It&#8217;s unlike you to be quite this wilfully stupid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
