<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Interfering with the Anglican Church</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2007/12/17/interfering-with-the-anglican-church/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2007/12/17/interfering-with-the-anglican-church/</link>
	<description>Everyone has a right to my opinions</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 19:08:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Robert Sharp &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Church Standards</title>
		<link>http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2007/12/17/interfering-with-the-anglican-church/#comment-123940</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Sharp &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Church Standards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 17:52:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2007/12/17/interfering-with-the-anglican-church/#comment-123940</guid>
		<description>[...] Its none of my business, of course (or maybe it is), but does the Church of England not bother with the whole &#8220;no marriage for divorcees&#8221; rigmarole anymore? Or is that the sort of thing that can be waived for celebrities? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Its none of my business, of course (or maybe it is), but does the Church of England not bother with the whole &#8220;no marriage for divorcees&#8221; rigmarole anymore? Or is that the sort of thing that can be waived for celebrities? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
