<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama: Immune to the Bradley Effect</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2008/01/09/obama-immune-to-the-bradley-effect/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2008/01/09/obama-immune-to-the-bradley-effect/</link>
	<description>Everyone has a right to my opinions</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 18:05:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: DE</title>
		<link>http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2008/01/09/obama-immune-to-the-bradley-effect/#comment-126206</link>
		<dc:creator>DE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 15:50:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2008/01/09/obama-immune-to-the-bradley-effect/#comment-126206</guid>
		<description>In real primaries with no independents, Hillary will do better anyway. She may well be a beneficiary of the "crying effect".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In real primaries with no independents, Hillary will do better anyway. She may well be a beneficiary of the &#8220;crying effect&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Munro</title>
		<link>http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2008/01/09/obama-immune-to-the-bradley-effect/#comment-126166</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Munro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 12:44:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2008/01/09/obama-immune-to-the-bradley-effect/#comment-126166</guid>
		<description>I'm not sure you need to ban opinion polls, just the personal interaction around them, which is the essential context of the politeness principle.  Opinion polling needs to be completely impersonal and anonymous to be accurate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure you need to ban opinion polls, just the personal interaction around them, which is the essential context of the politeness principle.  Opinion polling needs to be completely impersonal and anonymous to be accurate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MK</title>
		<link>http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2008/01/09/obama-immune-to-the-bradley-effect/#comment-125930</link>
		<dc:creator>MK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 20:40:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2008/01/09/obama-immune-to-the-bradley-effect/#comment-125930</guid>
		<description>Of course, regarding female candidates, there's no need to even appear polite in the first place.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/08/opinion/08steinem.html?em&#38;ex=1200027600&#38;en=5b91a543afd99fcb&#38;ei=5087%0A</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course, regarding female candidates, there&#8217;s no need to even appear polite in the first place.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/08/opinion/08steinem.html?em&amp;ex=1200027600&amp;en=5b91a543afd99fcb&amp;ei=5087%0A" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/08/opinion/08steinem.html?em&amp;ex=1200027600&amp;en=5b91a543afd99fcb&amp;ei=5087%0A</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Sharp &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Ban Opinion Polls</title>
		<link>http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2008/01/09/obama-immune-to-the-bradley-effect/#comment-125899</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Sharp &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Ban Opinion Polls</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:28:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2008/01/09/obama-immune-to-the-bradley-effect/#comment-125899</guid>
		<description>[...] Robert Sharp       &#171; Obama: Immune to the Bradley Effect [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Robert Sharp       &laquo; Obama: Immune to the Bradley Effect [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Munro</title>
		<link>http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2008/01/09/obama-immune-to-the-bradley-effect/#comment-125894</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Munro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:16:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2008/01/09/obama-immune-to-the-bradley-effect/#comment-125894</guid>
		<description>A similar, non racial linguistic phenomena, called the "politeness principle" was widely credited with explaining why the tories won the 1993 UK gen election despite trailing badly in the polls.  When polled, significant numbers said they would vote labour, (as it was perceived to be a more socially acceptable vote) , but when they got into the polling booth, they actually voted conservative.  This seems like the same effect, but with a racial dimension, of not wanting to appear racist.  

I'll still think he'll win it - he has that aura around him, mind you so did JFK and look what happened to him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A similar, non racial linguistic phenomena, called the &#8220;politeness principle&#8221; was widely credited with explaining why the tories won the 1993 UK gen election despite trailing badly in the polls.  When polled, significant numbers said they would vote labour, (as it was perceived to be a more socially acceptable vote) , but when they got into the polling booth, they actually voted conservative.  This seems like the same effect, but with a racial dimension, of not wanting to appear racist.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;ll still think he&#8217;ll win it - he has that aura around him, mind you so did JFK and look what happened to him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
