<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A couple of constitutional questions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2008/03/06/a-couple-of-constitutional-questions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2008/03/06/a-couple-of-constitutional-questions/</link>
	<description>Everyone has a right to my opinions</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 23:01:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2008/03/06/a-couple-of-constitutional-questions/#comment-131620</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 17:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2008/03/06/a-couple-of-constitutional-questions/#comment-131620</guid>
		<description>Hold on - voting with your conscience and 'democratic' are two very different things.  While the former may be admirable, voting how you see fit with no accountability to the people who you are legislating over is in no way democratic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hold on - voting with your conscience and &#8216;democratic&#8217; are two very different things.  While the former may be admirable, voting how you see fit with no accountability to the people who you are legislating over is in no way democratic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Political Dissuasion</title>
		<link>http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2008/03/06/a-couple-of-constitutional-questions/#comment-131617</link>
		<dc:creator>Political Dissuasion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 03:09:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2008/03/06/a-couple-of-constitutional-questions/#comment-131617</guid>
		<description>I'm of the same view as you. Europhile, but appreciate there are a few things where if we worked together effectively (pah!), there's some issues we could really 'tackle'. I know this was covered ages ago and keeps coming up on any number of blogs every week, but I love this topic. Yes, they can, in effect block it, and Brown could use the Parliament Act if he wanted (and wanted to rile the public more than ever thought possible). Blair only used it once (to pass the fox-hunting ban becasue that's one that would never get through the Lords) and it would be a big move/mistake in my view. My worry though is if they block it, then the Govt will seek revenge (and future security and leverage) when it comes to reforming the House of Lords. To an extent, the House of Lords, in cases such as this, is more democratic than the Commons becasue they can vote on conscience and not fear party whips or losing their ministerial car. An odd an intriguing situation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m of the same view as you. Europhile, but appreciate there are a few things where if we worked together effectively (pah!), there&#8217;s some issues we could really &#8216;tackle&#8217;. I know this was covered ages ago and keeps coming up on any number of blogs every week, but I love this topic. Yes, they can, in effect block it, and Brown could use the Parliament Act if he wanted (and wanted to rile the public more than ever thought possible). Blair only used it once (to pass the fox-hunting ban becasue that&#8217;s one that would never get through the Lords) and it would be a big move/mistake in my view. My worry though is if they block it, then the Govt will seek revenge (and future security and leverage) when it comes to reforming the House of Lords. To an extent, the House of Lords, in cases such as this, is more democratic than the Commons becasue they can vote on conscience and not fear party whips or losing their ministerial car. An odd an intriguing situation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2008/03/06/a-couple-of-constitutional-questions/#comment-131540</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 13:32:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2008/03/06/a-couple-of-constitutional-questions/#comment-131540</guid>
		<description>Its the Parliament Act.  However, as Cleanthes says in the earlier commentary linked above, its unlikely they would invoke it in this case due to the political fallout that would ensue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its the Parliament Act.  However, as Cleanthes says in the earlier commentary linked above, its unlikely they would invoke it in this case due to the political fallout that would ensue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Munro</title>
		<link>http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2008/03/06/a-couple-of-constitutional-questions/#comment-131539</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Munro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 13:28:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2008/03/06/a-couple-of-constitutional-questions/#comment-131539</guid>
		<description>Not sure it's possible for them to block legislation.  There's a special process the commons can invoke (the something act)  which effectively steamrollers legislation through the Lords.  The most the lords can legally do is delay legislation, thier official function is a "refining" body.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure it&#8217;s possible for them to block legislation.  There&#8217;s a special process the commons can invoke (the something act)  which effectively steamrollers legislation through the Lords.  The most the lords can legally do is delay legislation, thier official function is a &#8220;refining&#8221; body.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cleanthes</title>
		<link>http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2008/03/06/a-couple-of-constitutional-questions/#comment-131524</link>
		<dc:creator>Cleanthes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 09:36:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2008/03/06/a-couple-of-constitutional-questions/#comment-131524</guid>
		<description>Pschaw: &lt;a href="http://theselectsociety.com/blog/?p=247" rel="nofollow"&gt;we covered this&lt;/a&gt; months ago.

:-)

All well?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pschaw: <a href="http://theselectsociety.com/blog/?p=247" rel="nofollow">we covered this</a> months ago.</p>
<p> <img src='http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>All well?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
