<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What is Channel 4 for?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2008/03/13/channel-4-for/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2008/03/13/channel-4-for/</link>
	<description>Everyone has a right to my opinions</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 19:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Scottish Roundup &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Swearing, but not swearing allegiance</title>
		<link>http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2008/03/13/channel-4-for/#comment-131568</link>
		<dc:creator>Scottish Roundup &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Swearing, but not swearing allegiance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 12:24:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2008/03/13/channel-4-for/#comment-131568</guid>
		<description>[...] 4 would certainly bid for it. But Robert Sharp is wondering what the station is actually for these [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 4 would certainly bid for it. But Robert Sharp is wondering what the station is actually for these [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grannie Rose</title>
		<link>http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2008/03/13/channel-4-for/#comment-131567</link>
		<dc:creator>Grannie Rose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 11:47:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2008/03/13/channel-4-for/#comment-131567</guid>
		<description>I always thought the reason why we need public service broadcasting is a) to allow us to enjoy television programmes  without being forced to watch advertisements  and b) to allow the corporation to make programmes which are in the public interest but not necessarily money spinners.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always thought the reason why we need public service broadcasting is a) to allow us to enjoy television programmes  without being forced to watch advertisements  and b) to allow the corporation to make programmes which are in the public interest but not necessarily money spinners.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Barrie</title>
		<link>http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2008/03/13/channel-4-for/#comment-131565</link>
		<dc:creator>David Barrie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 07:38:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2008/03/13/channel-4-for/#comment-131565</guid>
		<description>a national broadcaster as a leverage agent for regional economic development seems a flimsy rationale for public subsidy to me. in the corporate world, as you know, the shareholders would have broken up the entity by now in to an entertainment, information-delivering and merchandising company by now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a national broadcaster as a leverage agent for regional economic development seems a flimsy rationale for public subsidy to me. in the corporate world, as you know, the shareholders would have broken up the entity by now in to an entertainment, information-delivering and merchandising company by now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Munro</title>
		<link>http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2008/03/13/channel-4-for/#comment-131563</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Munro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 12:39:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2008/03/13/channel-4-for/#comment-131563</guid>
		<description>Channel 4 news is the best</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Channel 4 news is the best</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
