<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Case for Internet Regulation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2008/12/04/case-for-internet-regulation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2008/12/04/case-for-internet-regulation/</link>
	<description>Everyone has a right to my opinions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 00:40:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2008/12/04/case-for-internet-regulation/comment-page-1/#comment-133896</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 15:13:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/?p=1112#comment-133896</guid>
		<description>Indeed.  There&#039;s no disagreement that an efficent and standardised closed-captioning system would be the fairest.  The problem Joe Clark raises is simply that this is not being delivered by the market and self-regulating companies.  It needs a  powerful, disinterested body to push it through, and it looks like governments might be the only appropriate example.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed.  There&#8217;s no disagreement that an efficent and standardised closed-captioning system would be the fairest.  The problem Joe Clark raises is simply that this is not being delivered by the market and self-regulating companies.  It needs a  powerful, disinterested body to push it through, and it looks like governments might be the only appropriate example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clarice</title>
		<link>http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2008/12/04/case-for-internet-regulation/comment-page-1/#comment-133895</link>
		<dc:creator>Clarice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 04:17:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/?p=1112#comment-133895</guid>
		<description>Hmm.  This is very tricky.  I have to agree with you, but I don&#039;t think it&#039;d be right if I wasn&#039;t allowed to use stairs just because some people are in wheelchairs.

I think there should be an option, like a button, to choose sub-titles, for people that want them, or for sub-title-free content, for people that want &lt;i&gt;that&lt;/i&gt;.  I think that&#039;s the only fair way to do it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm.  This is very tricky.  I have to agree with you, but I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;d be right if I wasn&#8217;t allowed to use stairs just because some people are in wheelchairs.</p>
<p>I think there should be an option, like a button, to choose sub-titles, for people that want them, or for sub-title-free content, for people that want <i>that</i>.  I think that&#8217;s the only fair way to do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
