<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Linklog for 3rd May to 8th May</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2009/05/08/linklog-3rd-may/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2009/05/08/linklog-3rd-may/</link>
	<description>Everyone has a right to my opinions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:36:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2009/05/08/linklog-3rd-may/comment-page-1/#comment-134846</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 17:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/?p=1772#comment-134846</guid>
		<description>LOL.  Yeah, I guess most people could figure it out, but I suppose it betrays my lack of faith that most will click through to my blog at all.

I guess I base my thinking on what I do personally... which is read blogs through an RSS feed.  So people like me wouldn&#039;t have a clue that the del.icio.us feed exists if it wasn&#039;t for the weekly post.  And since I add wee comments, rather than just decriptions, to the links, I sort of feel its comment worth re-posting... which Postalicious does automatically for me anyway.

But it does betray a desire, previously denied on the blog, that I am creating this blog &lt;em&gt;for readers&lt;/em&gt; rather than &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2009/04/23/kafka-twitter/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;just a scrap book&lt;/a&gt;.  If it was just the latter, there would be no del.icio.us or twitter link-ups.

I suppose what becomes annoying is the alert to a &quot;new post&quot; (in your RSS feed or whatever) which then turns out to be a disappointing digest of previously posted items.  Maybe I&#039;ll reduce the frequency of such posts.

Could yourself lucky that I don&#039;t also post my tweets here, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.chickyog.net/2008/03/27/twitter-daily-digest-for-2008-03-27/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;as Jason did for a while&lt;/a&gt;...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL.  Yeah, I guess most people could figure it out, but I suppose it betrays my lack of faith that most will click through to my blog at all.</p>
<p>I guess I base my thinking on what I do personally&#8230; which is read blogs through an RSS feed.  So people like me wouldn&#8217;t have a clue that the del.icio.us feed exists if it wasn&#8217;t for the weekly post.  And since I add wee comments, rather than just decriptions, to the links, I sort of feel its comment worth re-posting&#8230; which Postalicious does automatically for me anyway.</p>
<p>But it does betray a desire, previously denied on the blog, that I am creating this blog <em>for readers</em> rather than <a href="http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2009/04/23/kafka-twitter/" rel="nofollow">just a scrap book</a>.  If it was just the latter, there would be no del.icio.us or twitter link-ups.</p>
<p>I suppose what becomes annoying is the alert to a &#8220;new post&#8221; (in your RSS feed or whatever) which then turns out to be a disappointing digest of previously posted items.  Maybe I&#8217;ll reduce the frequency of such posts.</p>
<p>Could yourself lucky that I don&#8217;t also post my tweets here, <a href="http://www.chickyog.net/2008/03/27/twitter-daily-digest-for-2008-03-27/" rel="nofollow">as Jason did for a while</a>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: de</title>
		<link>http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/2009/05/08/linklog-3rd-may/comment-page-1/#comment-134845</link>
		<dc:creator>de</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 16:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertsharp.co.uk/?p=1772#comment-134845</guid>
		<description>You do realise that we can just go to http://delicious.com/robertsharp don&#039;t you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You do realise that we can just go to <a href="http://delicious.com/robertsharp" rel="nofollow">http://delicious.com/robertsharp</a> don&#8217;t you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

