Barrister

Tag: freedom of expression (Page 1 of 31)

Andrei Aliaksandrau is Free

When I worked for English PEN there were occasions where someone for whom we had campaigned, whose face I had printed onto hundreds of banners and posters, would walk into our office, free. It was a jarring experience, like seeing a celebrity on the tube.

A campaigner holds a poster of Syrian political prisoner Mazen Darwish
An English PEN campaigner holds a poster of Syrian political prisoner Mazen Darwish, London 19 May 2015.
Robert Sharp and Mazen Darwish at the Free Word Centre, London, 18 July 2016.

When I met the Syrian journalist Mazen Darwish, I wrote:

I’ll also say that it’s a strange experience to meet in person someone for whom one has campaigned. We used the same old photo of Mazen for all our tweets and news releases and posters. The person becomes a symbol, an icon, a cipher. When I saw him sitting on the bench chuckling and smoking a cigarette, sweating a little in the London heat, there was a moment of dissonance, as if a fictitious character had become incarnate.

It’s different for him, of course. Even while unseen in Adra prison, Mazen was always very real, all flesh, vulnerable to torture, at risk of death. And Yara, so used to her husband’s physical presence in their house and their work, must have felt his absence deeply.

With Andrei Aliaksandrau it was different. A flesh and blood man who I had campaigned alongside, drank pints with, bantered with, suddenly two-Dimensional on a campaign poster. It’s fantastic to hear that he has been released from prison in Belarus, and that perhaps we will one day see him in three dimensions again.

Andrei and his wife Irina, following their release. 16 September 2026.

Open Justice and Journalist Access to the Courts

I have written another judgment summary over at Family Law Week, this time for the case of Jessica Bradley v CM & Ors [2026] EWHC 125 (Fam).

This was an application by a journalist for access to the reports of a clinic psychologist in four separate child arrangements proceedings. The application went beyond what journalists are routinely allowed access to under the ‘template transparency order‘.

This case is in many ways a companion judgment to Re AB (Disclosure of Position Statements) [2025] EWCOP 25 (T3) in the Court of Protection. This was another judgment of Poole J, in which disclosure of documents from previous hearings (that an observer had not attended) was ordered on the open justice principle. That judgment is under appeal.

I am aware that access to documents in order to understand hearings is not limited to the Family Court and Court of Protection. Last month I noted that criminal court reporters were grumbling about lack of access.

Continue reading

Defamation Claims in 2020: A Libel Thaw?

Just published on the International Forum for Responsible Media (Inforrm) Blog – an article by yrstrly on what we can learn from the High Court defamation claims issued in 2020.

I scraped data from the HM Courts & Tribunal Service e-filing system and was able to extract some insights on how the Defamation Act 2013 and recent Court judgments have affected the kinds of claims made.

« Older posts

© 2026 Robert Sharp

Theme by Anders Noren — Up ↑