Barrister

Tag: Human Rights (Page 1 of 41)

Andrei Aliaksandrau is Free

When I worked for English PEN there were occasions where someone for whom we had campaigned, whose face I had printed onto hundreds of banners and posters, would walk into our office, free. It was a jarring experience, like seeing a celebrity on the tube.

A campaigner holds a poster of Syrian political prisoner Mazen Darwish
An English PEN campaigner holds a poster of Syrian political prisoner Mazen Darwish, London 19 May 2015.
Robert Sharp and Mazen Darwish at the Free Word Centre, London, 18 July 2016.

When I met the Syrian journalist Mazen Darwish, I wrote:

I’ll also say that it’s a strange experience to meet in person someone for whom one has campaigned. We used the same old photo of Mazen for all our tweets and news releases and posters. The person becomes a symbol, an icon, a cipher. When I saw him sitting on the bench chuckling and smoking a cigarette, sweating a little in the London heat, there was a moment of dissonance, as if a fictitious character had become incarnate.

It’s different for him, of course. Even while unseen in Adra prison, Mazen was always very real, all flesh, vulnerable to torture, at risk of death. And Yara, so used to her husband’s physical presence in their house and their work, must have felt his absence deeply.

With Andrei Aliaksandrau it was different. A flesh and blood man who I had campaigned alongside, drank pints with, bantered with, suddenly two-Dimensional on a campaign poster. It’s fantastic to hear that he has been released from prison in Belarus, and that perhaps we will one day see him in three dimensions again.

Andrei and his wife Irina, following their release. 16 September 2026.

A New Job, and (Hopefully) a Return to the Blog

Last month I began a pupillage at Field Court Chambers. It is a civil set with a strong Public Law team, and I am enjoying spending time in the Court of Protection and the Administrative Court. The power of the state over the individual, and the rights that the individual might have against the exercise of state power, was a theme of my undergraduate studies and my career since (at least) 2007. 

So I find myself in a state of eudaimonia (εὐδαιμονία), the good spirit of feeling I am doing exactly what I should doing. I cannot wait to begin taking instructions and building a practice.

My new job has got me thinking about this old blog. My conversion to the law and subsequent legal work in the County Courts and for the Royal Borough of Greenwich has kept me away. 

The activism of writing was entirely in keeping with my work at English PEN. But in recent years, I felt I had to refrain. There were many reasons for this. 

Continue reading

Democracy vs Ochlocracy

The Government’s hideous Rwanda asylum plan has been ruled unlawful by the Supreme Court.

Under the plan, people who applied for asylum in the UK after arriving via an irregular route would be deported to Rwanda, and have their claim processed there. Not everyone realised that successful applicants would be granted asylum in Rwanda.

My view is that the policy is wrong on the most fundamental level. We take far fewer refugees than we should, if they were dispersed proportionally throughout the world. There are reasons why people choose particular countries for their asylum claim and it’s often to do with prior links to that country. It’s absurd that a person who already has family living in the UK, and who applies to the UK government for asylum, should be sent elsewhere.

Continue reading

Defamation Claims in 2020: A Libel Thaw?

Just published on the International Forum for Responsible Media (Inforrm) Blog – an article by yrstrly on what we can learn from the High Court defamation claims issued in 2020.

I scraped data from the HM Courts & Tribunal Service e-filing system and was able to extract some insights on how the Defamation Act 2013 and recent Court judgments have affected the kinds of claims made.

Libel Justice for Nowy Czas

Nowy Czas is a newspaper that serves the Polish community of London. It is edited by Grzegorz and Teresa Malkiewicz.

Back in 2015 they published an article about a businessman. They discussed his historic business dealings and bankruptcy, and expressed concern at his involvement with two charitable organisations: The POSK cultural centre in Hammersmith, and the Kolbe House Care home in Ealing.

The gentleman in question sued the newspaper for libel, and the case was heard in 2017. Nowy Czas successfully defended the article, using the defences of ‘substantial truth’ (Defamation Act 2013, section 2) and ‘public interest’ (section 4).

Continue reading
« Older posts

© 2026 Robert Sharp

Theme by Anders Noren — Up ↑