Robert Sharp

Pupil Barrister

Page 277 of 328

Hideously White

There is an amusing story in The Observer about the Commission of Racial Equality’s Christmas card. It features a traditional nativity scene, with a set of scribbles over it, suggesting ‘politically correct’ ways it could be improved:

‘Three wise men can’t be all men’ suggests one scribble. ‘The snow looks hideously white’ notes another. ‘Sheep should look more diverse’ reads another doodle.

Its good to see those who are often accused of having no sense of humour, satirizing themselves. Jamie Doward in The Observer worries that “liberal sensibilities” will once again be upset by the CRE. On the contrary, I think it is more likely that those already critical of Political Correctness will be the ones who get annoyed: If you already find the concept infuriating, then the sight of one of its primary purveyors sniggering about it might be even more annoying. Personally, I do believe there is some value in ‘Political Correctness’, but it is a tool which needs to be used in a more careful and nuanced fashion. The stereotypical ‘gone mad’ usage, as lampooned on the CRE Christmas card, we can do without.
The Pub Philosopher has a picture of the actual card, which I could not find earlier. Meanwhile, Cleanthes at The Select Society is unsurprised that some people on The Left do not get the joke. I hope my above post goes some way to reminding him that not everyone has had a senseofhumourotomy.

Deny the obvious

From UKIP Home:

It’s well known that you should not create a political frame that creates a positive view of your opposition.
For example, no political leader would ever publicly say they believe their rivals will win even if the rival has 60% poll share rating.
The reason is obvious; by stating the possibility of your rival winning, you add strength to that frame because you do not want it to happen.

Yes, yes, a well known Machiavellian strategy. But one that is also highly irritating and patronising to the average punter. We voters know very well how the opinion polls rate the parties; and we are no less able than a politician to understand, say, concepts of percentage swing. When one party is massively ahead of the other in the polls, denial is just stupid. No-one wants an ostritch as their representative.
Why do politicians believe that denying the obvious somehow wins them votes? How about trying to win votes by the power of argument, rather losing votes with these school-boy mind-tricks?

Multimedia theatre: a new art form?

Yesterday, The Guardian blog published a delightfully complimentary article by Lyn Gardner on Waves, the show currently playing in The Cottesloe Theatre at The National. As I’ve written previously, our company Fifty Nine worked as video designers for the show, with my colleague Leo Warner working with the director, cast and crew to create something that I thought was extraordinary. Clearly Lyn Gardner agrees:

It is as if Mitchell, her actors and video artist Leo Warner have created an entirely new art form …

We have been focusing on how to effectively integrate new digital technologies (primarily video and projection) into theatre shows for several years now, so it is satisfying when someone echos our thoughts in print:

A split second later you are in yet another person’s head as the multi-stranded, non-linear, non-narrative stream of consciousness unfolds with the fluidity of running water. It feels shockingly intimate and oddly dispassionate, and neither film nor live action alone could come anywhere close to achieving this curious and disconcerting split sensation

The challenge at the outset is to match the message and the medium. We have focused on ideas of non-linearity and streams of consciousness because they can be better expressed using these new technologies.
At Fifty Nine, we are busy finalising an experimental, non-linear online film, Sweet Fanny Adams in Eden, by the playwright Judith Adams. The play was written in HTML, and orginally perfomed promenade style, in the Scottish Plant Collectors Garden in Pitlochry in 2003. The audience and actors wandered around the garden, choosing which scenes to watch. For more on the use of multimedia in theatrical production, I humbly recommend my short essay on the play, written in November 2003. One passage compliments Garnder’s review, above:

.. non-linearity better reflects the human mind, thoughts, history. We are constantly affected by the actions of others, and each thought (indeed, each life) is affected not by one, but several narratives that have gone before. A scene has two meanings, one for each character. A scene may have two meanings, depending on what has preceded it. There is circularity to our lives and our history that is ideally represented by a non-linear medium…

I’ve added a copy of that essay to this blog too – I hope you enjoy reading the whole thing. When the online film is launched, I shall certainly announce it on this site too. In the meantime, please do go and see Waves, and let me know what you thought of it here in the comments!

Fallacies

Overheard at a house-warming party:

Drunk blogger: Well, I’ve been called an ‘Islamophobe’ and an ‘anti-semite’ on my blog, so…
Drunk non-blogger: … you’re just the bigot in the middle?

The fallacy of the blogger here, of course, is to assume that the two positions attributed to him are mutally exclusive, and therefore cancel each other out. This is not the case at all, as his respondent was so quick to point out.
Its an extension of that argument which says that if you are against position x (say, the invasion of Iraq) you are necessarily supportive of position y (the regime of Saddam), which doesn’t quite capture the true nature of the situation. The fallacy begins when we assume that these arguments are binary, zero-sum problems. Our politicians (supported by their cohorts in the media) are very good at promoting these falsehoods. “You’re either with us or against us”. Buy into the way they have framed the debate, and your argument is already lost.
And yes, dear reader: I was that blogger.

« Older posts Newer posts »

© 2026 Robert Sharp

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑