Pupil Barrister
Things that happen to me, or things I do
In the hours leading up to the New Year, I scoffed at the news reports of celebrations around the globe. Essentially, the TV channels were reporting the fact that the world continues to turn on its axis and orbit the earth.
However, a day later I found myself tweeting precisely the same fact.
South London Sunrise
Happy New Year!
I am going to bait the Bull of Fate by waving a big red New Year Resolution, which is this: I shall attempt to practice the Inbox Zero method in 2013. It is essentially a common-sense mindset that prevents thousands of messages building up in your inbox, and (more importantly) makes you more productive and pro-active. Continue reading
Jack of Kent has an interesting post about St Luke’s Gospel. He says that the nativity story has been embellished and fabricated to the point where it is simply incorrect… other than the fact that Jesus was indeed born around 4 BC, somewhere in what is now modern Palestine.
Why ‘improve’ on the nativity? Simply put, it makes for better PR, and helps the religion to grow! This mutation of the original facts reminds me of the idea thought that religion is very much like a strand of DNA. The individual elements of the story change and adapt, the better to survive and flourish. Yet throughout, the essence of the story remains.
It was none other than Richard Dawkins who coined the word ‘meme‘ for ideas that grow and evolve, in his famous treatise The Selfish Gene. So I am surprised at the venom with which he and other atheists slag off religion and the preposterous, obviously false claims contained within the Abrahamic texts. If you want the kernel of the Nazarene’s philosophy to survive a couple of millennia of war, disease, natural disaster, shifting borders and mutating languages, then you have to wrap it in parables, fabulism, and sound-bites.* Continue reading
Following the awful, awful news of the massacre in Conneticut, the gun-control debate has begun afresh in the USA.
The canard from those who support the current, ridiculous status quo, is that the problem lies in “evil people doing evil acts”, and not the availability of weapons. How do the pro-gun advocates reconcile this argument with the doctrine of American exceptionalism?
If one holds that permissive gun laws have no causal connection to the frequent massacres, and that the daily murders are simply caused by evil of people… then one is left with the heretical conclusion that there are simply more evil people in America than elsewhere. This does not sit well with the idea of America being intrisically better than other countries.
Shibboleths collide! Call for Doctor Pangloss!
Parliament, 17th December 2012
© 2026 Robert Sharp
Theme by Anders Noren — Up ↑