A New Job, and (Hopefully) a Return to the Blog

Last month I began a pupillage at Field Court Chambers. It is a civil set with a strong Public Law team, and I am enjoying spending time in the Court of Protection and the Administrative Court. The power of the state over the individual, and the rights that the individual might have against the exercise of state power, was a theme of my undergraduate studies and my career since (at least) 2007. 

So I find myself in a state of eudaimonia (εὐδαιμονία), the good spirit of feeling I am doing exactly what I should doing. I cannot wait to begin taking instructions and building a practice.

My new job has got me thinking about this old blog. My conversion to the law and subsequent legal work in the County Courts and for the Royal Borough of Greenwich has kept me away. 

The activism of writing was entirely in keeping with my work at English PEN. But in recent years, I felt I had to refrain. There were many reasons for this. 

Continue reading “A New Job, and (Hopefully) a Return to the Blog”

Votes For 16 Year Olds? That’s Still Too High

The voting age is to be lowered to 16. All the naysayers are trotting out exactly the same arguments that, a century ago, were deployed against giving women the vote. The same arguments that were deployed against giving black South Africans the vote.

People say that 16 year olds do not have the maturity or the intellectual sophistication to make an informed choice when they vote. People fear that they will be influenced by what their families will tell them to do. Or by cheap electoral bribes.

Well guess what folks: this is not the Civil Service Fast Track. This is not the Bar. There is no competency test by which people become eligible to vote. The franchise is ours by right and there is no minimum standard before a voter is allowed to make a choice. They are permitted to vote base on vibes or feels, or on a single issue, or astrology, or a toss of a coin, or ‘tribally’ based on how people they identify with have voted. It’s all permitted.

If people vote in their self interest, then I would posit that younger voters are more likely to consider the Long Term in their voting behaviour. That is a good thing and lending political support to long term political thinking is a good thing.

It is amusing and infuriating in equal measure that just the kind of people who said democracy was sacrosanct following the Brexit referendum may now be found decrying the extension of the franchise: it is not a good look and such arguments will not age well.

I do have one criticism of the policy, however: it does not go far enough. The correct voting age is 10 years old, the same as the age of criminal responsibility. If you are old enough to know right from wrong then I say you are old enough to vote. No further intellectual capacity is required under the current system and no further intellectual competence should be required of children before they participate in democracy, which is the same as participating in society.

In the meantime, votes for 16 year olds is a good start. Let us co-opt more citizens into our democratic system, and instil in them earlier the habit of voting. It will strengthen our politics and engage young people.

59 Productions and the creative Large Hadron Collider

Mark Grommer at TED

My goodness.

When I started this blog in 2005, it was an experiment. The software was new technology and there were many people eager to get their hands on it — to see what they could do with it and how it might change society. In my early posts I tried out different styles of writing and different topics to write about. I made friends and received praise for my output. It was in the back-and-forth of blogging that I learnt to write clearly and persuasively, which has led to a weird, varied and rewarding career.

The impetus to experiment with new technology came out of the milieu in which I was working at the time, in the office of 59 Productions in Edinburgh. Collaboration was highly valued: the idea that creative people would, together, be more than the sum of their talents. Digital technology was becoming cheaper, and we adopted guerrilla approach to film-making and theatre. Where the tech did not yet exist, we chained together disparate components and made-for-other-purposes software to produce the desired effect.

Scotland was the perfect incubator: host to internationally famous festivals, and yet small enough that the most influential and creative people in Scottish film and theatre were usually only a phone call or a five minute walk away.

We made some marvellous things.

Continue reading “59 Productions and the creative Large Hadron Collider”

The Equaliser

The Labour politician Frank Field (Lord Field of Birkenhead) has died aged 81. He had prostate cancer.

Back in 2015 I had my own fight with that disease. Actually, it was less of a fight, and more a minor altercation. A fracas, or an affray. I was diagnosed with testicular cancer, and had an orchidectomy the next day. 


An instant cure, which I’ve always thought as Nature’s cruel contribution to the inequality of sexes. Some uniquely female cancers are not so easily dealt with and are just as deadly as they were a generation ago

Continue reading “The Equaliser”

Democracy vs Ochlocracy

Simpsons Angry Mob

The Government’s hideous Rwanda asylum plan has been ruled unlawful by the Supreme Court.

Under the plan, people who applied for asylum in the UK after arriving via an irregular route would be deported to Rwanda, and have their claim processed there. Not everyone realised that successful applicants would be granted asylum in Rwanda.

My view is that the policy is wrong on the most fundamental level. We take far fewer refugees than we should, if they were dispersed proportionally throughout the world. There are reasons why people choose particular countries for their asylum claim and it’s often to do with prior links to that country. It’s absurd that a person who already has family living in the UK, and who applies to the UK government for asylum, should be sent elsewhere.

Continue reading “Democracy vs Ochlocracy”